8 TweetDeck Alternatives for Managing Multiple Twitter Accounts

TweetDeck was once the ultimate dashboard for managing multiple Twitter accounts. A real-time, no-nonsense control center for social media managers, brands, and power users. 

But now? TweetDeck is locked behind X Pro’s paywall, missing a mobile app, and honestly, just not as intuitive as it used to be.

So, what now? Do we just pay a hefty amount for not-so-good features?

No way. I’ve spent over a decade in social media marketing, testing and tweaking tools, and I will help you find the best TweetDeck alternatives—ones that don’t just match its features but go beyond what TweetDeck ever offered.

If you’re tired of paying for what used to be free or need a better Twitter management tool that fits your workflow, I’ve got you covered.

Let’s dive into the best replacements to upgrade your Twitter strategy today!

Top 5 TweetDeck Alternatives at a Glance

Here’s a quick comparison of the top 5 TweetDeck competitors to help you choose the best tool for Twitter management, scheduling, or engagement—whether you’re a brand, agency, or solo creator.

Top 8 TweetDeck Alternatives for Managing Multiple Twitter Accounts

1. Hootsuite

Having used both Hootsuite and TweetDeck extensively, I can confidently say that Hootsuite is the superior choice for anyone managing multiple social media accounts, not just Twitter.

While TweetDeck was great for real-time monitoring and scheduling tweets, its  shift to a paid-only model (X Pro) and lack of integration with other social platforms make it far less versatile.

With Hootsuite, I can schedule posts across multiple platforms, track engagement metrics, and manage a team—something TweetDeck never indeed offered. 

The analytics feature in Hootsuite is far more advanced, providing deeper insights into audience preferences, post performance, and social media strategies. However, Hootsuite is pricier, and its dashboard can initially feel overwhelming.

In short, if you need a full-scale social media management tool with detailed analytics and cross-platform support, Hootsuite wins. But TweetDeck (X Pro) might still be worth considering if you’re solely focused on Twitter management.

Best for:

Large enterprises, Marketing teams, Brands, and Content creators.

Rating:

4.2/5 (G2)

Olivia B. – 5 Stars

The piece of Hootsuite that I like best is the AI post generator. It helps take so much of the burden off when needing ideas for text for a post. The software is super easy to use and it took less than a day for us to implement the software. Our Marketing uses the platform daily.

Key features:

• Advanced analytics and reporting
• Team collaboration tools
• Integration with third-party tools
• Multi-platform scheduling
• Real-time monitoring

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is limited to Twitter, Hootsuite allows you to manage multiple social media accounts.
• Lets you manage DMs and mentions across platforms, unlike TweetDeck, which only tracks tweets.
• Hootsuite offers post approvals, task assignments, and workflow management, which are missing in TweetDeck.

Cons:

• TweetDeck’s strength is its customizable real-time monitoring dashboard, while Hootsuite does not offer the same customization.
• With more features comes complexity; TweetDeck had a simpler, Twitter-specific interface.

Pricing:

Hootsuite offers three pricing plans: Professional ($99 per month/10 social accounts), Team ($249 per month/20 social accounts), and Enterprise (Custom/50 social accounts).

---

2. SocialPilot

TweetDeck was once my go-to for Twitter management, but SocialPilot offers more flexibility with multi-platform management.

While TweetDeck was great for real-time monitoring and engagement on Twitter, it lacked integration with other social media platforms, making it less useful for brands and agencies with a broader strategy.

SocialPilot is a better choice for content scheduling, offering bulk uploading, automation, and multi-account management across major platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and even Google Business Profile. Unlike TweetDeck, SocialPilot also provides client collaboration tools—a game-changer for agencies.

In short, if you’re a social media manager or agency needing robust scheduling and monitoring across multiple platforms, SocialPilot wins. Whereas, if you’re purely focused on Twitter engagement in real-time, TweetDeck (X Pro) might still be a fit.

Best for:

Agencies, social media managers, Small to medium businesses, Creators, and Solopreneurs.

Rating:

4.5/5 (G2)

Verified User in Construction – 5 Stars

It’s super easy to connect our accounts and schedule our posts! It was easy to implement with our team and our users. We are posting to over 75 social accounts weekly so having a tool that is easy to use is extremely helpful.

Key features:

• Collaboration and approval workflows
• Team collaboration
• Intuitive social media calendar
• Advanced publishing
• White-label reports
• Detailed Twitter analytics and reporting
• Create UTM parameters to track social traffic

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is limited to Twitter, SocialPilot lets you manage multiple social media accounts.
• SocialPilot allows bulk content uploads across different platforms, something TweetDeck lacks.
• SocialPilot has a cleaner, more intuitive dashboard than TweetDeck’s cluttered, column-based interface.

Cons:

• TweetDeck’s live multi-column feed is better for tracking conversations in real time.
• While SocialPilot has a unified inbox, it lacks TweetDeck’s quick-reply engagement for tweets.
• SocialPilot has no Twitter thread scheduling or real-time trending topic tracking like TweetDeck.

Pricing:

SocialPilot offers four pricing plans: Essentials ($30 per month for 1 user), Standard ($50 per month for 3 users), Premium ($100 per month for 6 users), Ultimate ($200 per month for unlimited users, and Enterprise (Custom).

---

3. Tweet Hunter

After using Tweet Hunter, I consider it a powerhouse for growth-focused Twitter users. It isn’t just a scheduling tool—it’s built to help you grow.

Tweet Hunter is designed to help you grow your audience, boost engagement, and monetize your Twitter presence. It offers AI-generated tweet ideas, automated engagement, and advanced scheduling, game-changers for content creators, entrepreneurs, and personal brands.

TweetDeck, on the other hand, was great for real-time monitoring and tracking conversations, but it lacked growth-focused features. Plus, its appeal has dropped with its shift to a paid model. Tweet Hunter isn’t free either, but the value it brings for personal brands, entrepreneurs, and creators is unmatched.

In short, if you want to grow, automate, and maximize Twitter’s potential, Tweet Hunter is the way to go. TweetDeck (X Pro) might still be useful for real-time tracking and multi-account monitoring.

Best for:

Content creators, Influencers, Entrepreneurs, and Startups.

Rating:

3.5/5 (G2)

Dilip Chowdary R. – 4.5 Stars

It comes with easy integration, provides AI-generated Tweets, Analytics that matter, and easy scheduling of tweets, and threads, and also has exciting features like “Best time to tweet” and a dynamic Banner.

Key features:

• AI-powered Tweet ideas
• Advanced scheduling and automation
• Retweet and reply automation
• Follower growth tracking
• Twitter thread scheduling

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which focuses on real-time tracking, Tweet Hunter is designed to grow your audience and increase engagement.
• Unlike TweetDeck, which only allows basic tweet scheduling, Tweet Hunter lets you plan entire Twitter threads.

Cons:

• Unlike TweetDeck, you can’t monitor multiple feeds or track hashtags in real time.
• TweetDeck has a more convenient setup than Tweet Hunter if you handle multiple Twitter accounts.
• TweetDeck allows you to track keywords, hashtags, and lists effortlessly, which Tweet Hunter lacks.

Pricing:

Tweet Hunter offers three pricing plans: Discover ($29 per month), Grow ($49 per month), and Enterprise ($200 per month).

---

4. Sprout Social

Using Sprout Social was beneficial for managing Twitter at scale. It’s an excellent choice for brands, agencies, and businesses that need advanced analytics, scheduling, and engagement tools beyond what TweetDeck ever offered.

Sprout Social excels in social media management, offering multi-platform scheduling, a unified social inbox, and AI-powered insights—features that TweetDeck doesn’t have.

Unlike TweetDeck, which lacked fundamental reporting tools, the detailed analytics feature provides deeper insights into audience behavior. However, Sprout Social comes at a premium price, which might be overkill for users who need essential Twitter management. Also, TweetDeck’s multi-column dashboard for real-time monitoring is better suited for those who need to track multiple Twitter feeds simultaneously.

In short, Sprout Social wins if you need a powerful all-in-one social media tool with detailed analytics. But TweetDeck (X Pro) might still be a better fit if you’re solely managing Twitter and need real-time tracking.

Best for:

Brands, Large businesses, Enterprises, Big teams, and Businesses.

Rating:

4.4/5 (G2)

Alexis K.– 5 Stars

I love everything about Sprout, so much so that I really pushed for it when I made the move from my old job to my current one. The interface is really easy to use, it looks really nice, and we’re able to really have an almost “one stop shop” so social post scheduling. I use it every day, multiple times a day.

Key features:

• Scheduling and publishing
• Social listening tools
• Twitter analytics and reporting
• Team collaboration and workflow approval
• Influencer collaboration features

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is Twitter-exclusive, Sprout Social manages multiple social media platforms in one place.
• Tracks brand sentiment, industry trends, and competitor analysis, something TweetDeck doesn’t offer.

Cons:

• Sprout Social is one of the most expensive social media management tools, while TweetDeck (before X Pro) costs much less.
• With so many advanced features, it takes time to learn and navigate it compared to TweetDeck’s simpler interface.
• If your main focus is Twitter/X management, TweetDeck’s interface is more tailored than Sprout Social’s.

Pricing:

Sprout Social’s pricing plans are as follows: Standard ($249 per seat/month), Professional ($399 per seat/month), and Advanced ($499 per seat/month). For large Enterprises, you need to contact Sprout for pricing.

---

5. Agorapulse

In my experience, Agorapulse is a solid choice for brands and agencies that need advanced engagement management and analytics beyond what TweetDeck ever offered.

I was particularly impressed by Agorapulse’s unified social inbox, which centralizes DMs, comments, and mentions across multiple platforms, making it far more efficient than TweetDeck’s Twitter-only tracking. 

Agorapulse’s reporting tools are in-depth, providing valuable insights into audience behavior, post performance, and ROI. It also supports team collaboration, allowing role-based access and approval workflows—something TweetDeck lacks.

However, Agorapulse is more expensive, and while its scheduling tools are robust, it doesn’t offer TweetDeck’s multi-column real-time monitoring for Twitter.

In short, if you need detailed analytics, engagement management, and collaboration tools, Agorapulse is the better option. But if real-time Twitter tracking is your primary focus, TweetDeck (X Pro) remains relevant.

Best for:

Medium to large businesses, Marketing teams, Agencies, and Brands.

Rating:

4.5/5 (G2)

Jenna R.– 5 Stars

The everyday process of creating the post to getting it approved for publishing it is so much smoother. Reports are broader making our team weekly reports more concise. We rely heavily on this data to produce goals and show value. Creating reoccurring posts from the hard work I have already accomplished is amazing because it’s more bang for my buck!

Key features:

• Direct scheduling tool
• Detailed analytics and reporting
• AI writing assistant
• Social listening capability
• Customizable reports
• Social media monitoring

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is Twitter-exclusive, Agorapulse lets you manage Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and more.
• Provides detailed performance analytics and competitor insights, whereas TweetDeck lacks advanced analytics tools.
• Agorapulse offers team-based role assignments, while TweetDeck is built for individual users.

Cons:

• TweetDeck’s signature multi-column dashboard is better than Agorapulse for real-time Twitter tracking.
• The wide range of features in Agorapulse makes it more complex to set up than TweetDeck’s simple interface.

Pricing:

Agorapulse offers four paid plans: Standard ($99 per month), Professional ($149 per month), Advanced ($199 per month), and Enterprise (Custom). There is also a Free plan.

---

6. Buffer

When I switched from TweetDeck to Buffer, I noticed a clear difference in how each tool approaches social media management. While TweetDeck is all about real-time Twitter tracking, Buffer excels in content scheduling and performance tracking—making it a go-to for brands and creators who want a more structured posting strategy.

TweetDeck’s multi-column dashboard made it easy to track multiple Twitter accounts, hashtags, and mentions live, but it lacked analytics and automation. On the other hand, Buffer allows advanced tweet scheduling, post optimization, and cross-platform management. However, Buffer isn’t designed for real-time monitoring, and its free plan has limitations.

In short, if you need a Twitter-only, real-time engagement tool, TweetDeck (X Pro) still has an edge. But if you want a better scheduling system with analytics across multiple social media platforms, Buffer is the smarter pick.

Best for:

Businesses, Mid-stage startup teams, Solopreneurs, and E-commerce.

Rating:

4.3/5 (G2)

Tracy W. – 5 Stars

Buffer is extensively used in our company in marketing and corporate communication departments. It enables users to schedule and track scheduled posts across all major social networks. The analytics are great that show the performance of each post and aslo buffer is pretty affordable.

Key features:

• Social media calendar
• Schedule and queue posts
• Thread scheduling
• AI content generator
• In-depth analytics
• Canva and Dropbox integration

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is Twitter-exclusive, Buffer allows scheduling for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and more.
• The clean, intuitive interface makes Buffer easier to use than TweetDeck’s multi-column setup.
• Teams can review and approve content, while TweetDeck is built for individual users.

Cons:

• TweetDeck allows real-time keyword and hashtag tracking, which Buffer lacks.
• Buffer focuses on scheduling, but TweetDeck’s interface makes replying and engaging with multiple accounts easier.
• TweetDeck is more effective if you focus on managing multiple Twitter accounts with live updates.

Pricing:

Buffer offers two pricing plans: Essentials ($6 per month/channel) and Team ($12 per month/channel). There is also a Free plan.

---

7. Loomly

Loomly is a fantastic tool for content planning and collaboration, making it ideal for teams and brands managing multiple social media accounts. Unlike TweetDeck, which was all about real-time monitoring for Twitter, Loomly focuses on content creation, scheduling, and workflow management.

Loomly’s content calendar and post optimization tools are handy for planning and ensuring platform consistency. It also suggests content ideas and hashtags, something TweetDeck never did.

However, Loomly lacks TweetDeck’s real-time multi-column dashboard, making it less ideal for live engagement and rapid responses. If you’re looking for a tool specifically for Twitter monitoring, Loomly isn’t the best fit.

In short, if you need a structured content workflow, approvals, and scheduling for multiple platforms, Loomly wins. But if you rely on real-time Twitter tracking and quick engagement, TweetDeck (X Pro) is still better.

Best for:

Agencies, Startups, Individuals, SMBs, Freelancers, and Creators.

Rating:

4.6/5 (G2)

Erin D.– 5 Stars

It’s really simple to use and has a calendar view so I can see all my posts scheduled for the week. It’s super reliable and sends reminders if I’ve forgotten to change a post from draft to scheduled.

Key features:

• Post planning and scheduling
• Detailed analytics and reporting
• Social listening capabilities
• Smooth workflows and approval process
• All-in-one content calendar

Pros:

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is Twitter-exclusive, Loomly allows multi-platform scheduling.
• Provides AI-generated content ideas and hashtag recommendations, which TweetDeck lacks.
• Unlike TweetDeck, which requires manual tweet scheduling, Loomly automates and optimizes publishing.

Cons:

• TweetDeck is better for quick replies and live interactions, which Loomly doesn’t prioritize.
• While Loomly suggests content ideas, it doesn’t offer real-time keyword tracking like TweetDeck.

Pricing:

Loomly offers four pricing plans: Base ($42/month for 2 users), Standard ($80/month for 6 users), Advanced ($175/month for 14 users), and Premium ($369/month for 30 users).

---

8. SocialBee

When I first used SocialBee as an alternative to TweetDeck, I immediately noticed how much more structured and automation-friendly it was. Unlike TweetDeck, which is focused on real-time Twitter monitoring, 

SocialBee is built for efficient scheduling, categorization, and evergreen content recycling across multiple platforms. It efficiently manages multiple Twitter accounts with content queues and automated posting, helping businesses maintain consistency without manual effort.

 However, SocialBee lacks TweetDeck’s multi-column real-time feed, making it less functional for immediate engagement or tracking live conversations. Additionally, SocialBee’s analytics, while insightful, aren’t as detailed as some premium competitors.

In short, if you need content automation, post recycling, and scheduling across multiple social media platforms, SocialBee is the better choice. But if real-time Twitter tracking and engagement are your priority, TweetDeck (X Pro) still holds an advantage.

Best for:

Small businesses, Entrepreneurs, Content creators, and Marketers

Rating:

4.8/5 (G2)

Mel G. – 4.5 Stars

SocialBee makes organizing my content easier with its hashtag collections and category-based scheduling, which helps me make sure my posts align with my content pillars. One of the features I appreciate is how it automatically determines whether a YouTube video should be a Short or a full-length video based on the length and orientation of the video—saving me time.

Key features:

• Multi-platform scheduling
• Bulk scheduling and importing
• Post customization per platform
• AI-powered post variations
• Team collaboration and role-based access

Pros: 

• Unlike TweetDeck, which is Twitter-exclusive, SocialBee supports Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and more.
• SocialBee offers content categorization and evergreen recycling, which TweetDeck does not have.
• Unlike TweetDeck, where scheduling is manual and limited, SocialBee allows batch content creation and platform-specific customization.

Cons:

• TweetDeck’s multi-column dashboard makes tracking mentions, hashtags, and DMs live better.
• While SocialBee offers engagement tracking, TweetDeck (before X Pro) provides real-time activity insights at a glance.
• TweetDeck’s custom columns are better if you need instant updates on trends, mentions, and competitor activity.

Pricing:

SocialBee offers three pricing plans: Bootstrap ($29/month for 5 profiles), Accelerate ($49/month for 10 profiles), and Pro ($99/month for 25 profiles). All plans have a 14-day free trial.

Key Factors in Choosing the Best TweetDeck Alternative

After years of managing social media for brands, I’ve learned that choosing the right TweetDeck alternative isn’t just about scheduling tweets—it’s about finding a tool that aligns with your workflow, engagement needs, and long-term growth strategy.

Here’s what to consider:

1. Multi-Platform Support

If you manage more than just Twitter, look for a tool that supports multiple social media accounts. Hootsuite, Sprout Social, and SocialPilot are excellent choices for scheduling and analytics across various platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

2. Real-Time Monitoring & Engagement

Need to track mentions, hashtags, and conversations in real time? A tool with social listening capabilities is key. Hootsuite and Agorapulse offer robust monitoring, while Tweet Hunter helps automate engagement for growth.

3. Advanced Scheduling & Automation

For effortless content management, choose a platform with bulk scheduling, queue-based posting, and AI-driven automation. SocialBee, Buffer, and Loomly make content recycling and post automation seamless.

4. Collaboration & Team Management

A tool with approval workflows, role-based access, and shared calendars is crucial if you work with a team. Sprout Social, Agorapulse, and Loomly excel in team collaboration for agencies and large brands.

5. In-Depth Analytics & Reporting

Tracking engagement metrics, audience growth, and post performance is essential for refining your Twitter strategy. Sprout Social, Hootsuite, and Agorapulse offer detailed analytics and reporting features beyond what TweetDeck ever provided.

Which TweetDeck Competitor Are You Picking?

Choosing the best TweetDeck alternative comes down to your specific needs.

If you’re looking for real-time Twitter engagement, Hootsuite and Agorapulse are solid picks. Need a Twitter growth tool? Tweet Hunter is the way to go.

For content scheduling and automation, SocialBee, Buffer, and Loomly make life easier with queue-based posting and evergreen recycling. If you’re managing multiple social media accounts, Sprout Social and SocialPilot offer robust multi-platform scheduling and analytics.

My advice? Test the tools! Most of these platforms offer free trials, so find the one that fits your workflow, budget, and goals. Your social media management should feel efficient. The right tool won’t just replace TweetDeck—it’ll upgrade how you manage Twitter and beyond.